## 5. Convergence and conflict

**Attention, expectation, and framing.** Phenomenology describes changes in salience and presence; psychology measures expectancy and attribution; ritual traditions deliberately structure attention, setting, sequence, and intention. These accounts can converge on a human-level mechanism without agreeing on metaphysics. AI intensifies the process by responding contingently and generating further symbols. **Language can be causally efficacious without being supernatural.** A prompt changes a model; a vow changes social obligations; a prayer can regulate attention. Scientific explanations of some causal pathways do not exhaust devotional meaning. Conversely, performative or psychological efficacy does not prove cosmic efficacy. **Set, setting, and relationship shape experience.** Altered-state research, ritual theory, placebo research, and human–AI studies all indicate that expectations, environment, identity of the guide, and perceived authority can affect outcomes. This supports careful design and interpretation, not a single universal theory.

ManWoman

$ Min

$ Max

### 5.1 Convergences

**Transformation is real, but the transformed object differs.** Historical alchemy transformed substances and practitioner-world relations; AI transforms representations, choices, and experimental search. The overlap is structural and historical-metaphorical, not proof of a shared hidden force. **Language and form.** Alchemical codes, ritual formulas, prompts, and therapeutic framing all demonstrate that sequence, authority, expectation, and context can organize action and interpretation. **Cross-cultural concepts:** “Spirit,” “self,” “agency,” “possession,” “prayer,” and “ritual” do not map cleanly across languages or traditions. Research needs community-grounded definitions rather than importing one clinical or Western metaphysical scheme.